TO VISIT FRIENDFINDER.COM – CLICK HERE

After having awesome initial success with FriendFinder (not AdultFriendFinder – different site – less adult-oriented but not bad overall), we’re reduced to having less success in this last month. Why? We have NO IDEA. We didn’t drastically change our dating tactics – it might just be a lull in our luck.

The site’s still great to use however it no longer deserves the amazing praise it previously held a few months ago. Put simply – we had roughly the same amount of hook-ups from Passion.com in half the amount of time. That’s enough for us to bump this one down a little.

FriendFinder, we still love you – just not as much.

Here are the NEW FRIENDFINDER.COM STATS – not too much change, except for effort level put in by our sex-periment crew. Still better than not getting any @ all .:

FriendFinder.com UPDATED Statistics

===PREVIOUS REVIEW from JAN 2, 2010==

FriendFinder.com is by far the best site we could find out there for having a fling. It’s great for a number of reasons. The first is that the ratio of women to men is pretty damn good. You still have to do quite a bit of hunting – with the mandatory girls that never respond (fuck ‘em). The second is that this fling site has great comm (that’s communication, morons) features including cam chitchat. This helps you meet the person you’re talking to (also included – making sure she’s a SHE), and actually reduces your time-to-score. We went from meeting to macking in less than 5 hours. Pretty good experiment results, if you ask us! In general, we found the ladies on the site to be prettier and younger, probably ‘cuz it ranks well with students and younger professionals.

Below are the stats we gathered during our 2.5 month long FriendFinder.com experiment.:

FriendFinder.com Statistics (from JAN 2, 2009)